Publication:
Assessment of hurricane vortex and boundary layer models for the development of wind and pressure profiles and fields

dc.contributor.advisor Pagán-Trinidad, Ismael
dc.contributor.author Cordero-Mercado, Nelson Y.
dc.contributor.college College of Engineering en_US
dc.contributor.committee Nadal-Caraballo, Norberto C.
dc.contributor.committee Zapata-López, Raul E.
dc.contributor.department Department of Civil Engineering en_US
dc.contributor.representative Arroyo-Caraballo, Jose R.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-20T19:35:52Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-20T19:35:52Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12-09
dc.description.abstract The main objective of this project is to evaluate existing models and methods for representing the vortex and wind and pressure structures of tropical cyclones (TCs). The initial assessment was performed by comparing TC vortex profiles with observed wind and pressure from atmospheric reanalysis data provided by the National Hurricane Center’s (NHC) hurricane database (HURDAT; Landsea & Franklin, 2013) and Colorado State University’s (CSU) extended best track (EBTRK; Demuth et al., 2006). Several models for representing the vortex structure of a TC have been developed in the past. Recreation of wind and pressure profiles for each of the studied models for the selected TCs in the North Atlantic basin was achieved using MATLAB® scripts. The studied vortex models were able to reasonably represent the wind profile data included in HURDAT and EBTRK for tropical storms and hurricanes. It was found that the Holland (1980), the Holland et al. (2010) and the Xie et al. (2012) wind models performed better for decreasing hurricane intensity, capturing the behavior of both the 1-min average maximum sustained wind speeds (Vmax) and the standard 34-, 50-, and 64-knots gale winds. Also, the Willoughby et al. (2006) wind model replicated the Vmax and gale winds despite using smaller values of Rmax. However, the best representations of hurricane categories 1 through 5 wind data were obtained with the models presented by Hu et al. (2012) and Gao et al. (2015) with almost negligible root-mean-square error. Tropical storms and weaker TC were best represented by the model presented by Holland et al. (2010). The results of this project are intended to aid in the development of regulation and guidance that incorporates the latest developments in coastal hazard analysis and quantification of related uncertainties. en_US
dc.description.abstract El objetivo principal de este proyecto es evaluar los modelos y métodos existentes para representar el vórtice y las estructuras de viento y presión de los ciclones tropicales (CTs). La evaluación inicial se realizó comparando los perfiles de vórtice de CTs con datos observados de viento y presión de tormentas históricas, proporcionados por la base de datos de huracanes del Centro Nacional de Huracanes (HURDAT; Landsea and Franklin, 2013) y el “extended best track” proporcionado por la Universidad Estatal de Colorado (EBTRK; Demuth et al., 2006). En el pasado, se han desarrollado varios modelos para representar la estructura de vórtice de un CT. La recreación de los perfiles de viento y presión para cada uno de los modelos estudiados para los CTs seleccionadas en la cuenca del Atlántico Norte se logró utilizando algoritmos de MATLAB®. En general, los modelos de vórtice estudiados pudieron representar razonablemente los datos del perfil de viento incluidos en HURDAT y EBTRK para tormentas tropicales y huracanes. Se encontró que los modelos de vientos presentados por Holland (1980), Holland et al. (2010) y Xie et al. (2012) se desempeñaron mejor representando tormentas o huracanes débiles, capturando el comportamiento del viento máximo sostenido promedio de 1 min (Vmax) y los vientos huracanados estándar de 34, 50 y 64 nudos. Además, el modelo de viento presentado por Willoughby et al. (2006) replicó el Vmax y los vientos huracanados a pesar de utilizar valores más pequeños de Rmax. Sin embargo, las mejores representaciones de los datos de vientos de las categorías de huracán 1 a 5 se obtuvieron con los modelos presentados por Hu et al. (2012) y Gao (2018) con un RMSE casi insignificante. Las tormentas tropicales y los CT más débiles fueron mejor representados por el modelo presentado por Holland et al. (2010). Los resultados de este proyecto están destinados a ayudar en el desarrollo de regulaciones y guías que incorporen los últimos avances en el análisis de peligros costeros y la cuantificación de las incertidumbres relacionadas. en_US
dc.description.graduationSemester Fall en_US
dc.description.graduationYear 2021 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Investigation subsidized with funds from the USACE - US Army Engineering Research and Development Center (ERDC); Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory’s (CHL’s) Coastal Hazards Group en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11801/2852
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.holder (c) 2021 Nelson Y. Cordero Mercado en_US
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Tropical cyclone en_US
dc.subject Numerical simulations en_US
dc.subject Hurricane Maria 2017 en_US
dc.subject Holland 1980 en_US
dc.subject TC parametric vortex models en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Cyclones - Tropics - Simulation methods en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Wind - pressure - Simulation methods en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Hurricane Maria, 2017 en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Vortex-motion - Simulation methods en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Vortex - Mathematical models en_US
dc.title Assessment of hurricane vortex and boundary layer models for the development of wind and pressure profiles and fields en_US
dc.type Project Report en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
thesis.degree.discipline Civil Engineering en_US
thesis.degree.level M.E. en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
INCI_CorderoMercadoNY_2021.pdf
Size:
13.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: